Next Salon Discussion
Tuesday 2nd May: First Tuesday Current Affairs discussion
Discussing First topical issue (Simon Belt) and Second topical issue (Mark Iddon)
|Manchester lifestyle reviews|
Reviewed by Denis Joe July 2011
“For me, architecture is more about creating spaces and environments that accommodate the people working and living in them. All through the process it is important for us as well as the client to have an environment that is inspiring and designed with the human being in full focus. I believe that architecture creates behaviour”
The long-awaited £72 million Museum of Liverpool opened its doors in mid July, though I wanted to avoid the formality of the opening day and visit when ordinary folk were visiting. I have to admit that I didn’t hold out much hope for the museum and being greeted by five Superlambananas at the entrance did nothing to allay my fears - these monstrosities were forced upon the City during the City of Culture year, having been placed on the ring road after Liverpudlians proved unimpressed. No doubt some philistine in the council saw a tourist attraction and so they were mass produced and painted different colours, but no amount of multicultural dressing up is going to hide the misanthropic message behind them.
Even though it was a warm day, I don’t think that accounted for the fact that the Museum was packed, and I heard a lot more Liverpudlian accents than foreign or other regional accents. There are three levels to the museum and though the first floor exhibit has not been completed yet, the exhibits on the ground and second floor offer patrons a lot to think about.
The ground floor deals with the history of the City from the industrial age, through its ‘gateway to the Atlantic’ and Empire days, up to the end of World War 2 and is dominated by exhibitions of the Chinese community. Whilst the role of Chinese people cannot be underestimated it would be wrong to see the Chinese community as integrated into Liverpool as a whole. The history of the Chinese people in the City is not a very happy one and whilst Britain were engaged in rescuing democracy from the Axis powers during the second world war, it’s policemen, trade unions and council were, in 1942, denying parity of pay and conditions, sometimes violently, for Chinese Merchant seamen who faced the same dangers on the seas as white seamen (see Yvonne Foley’s excellent history of Liverpool’s Chinese / Eurasian community). However the exhibit as a whole is really impressive, and the layout is very much in keeping with how I remember museums in my childhood. Whilst there were the inevitable interactive exhibits the majority of the exhibits were behind glass cases, in order to be contemplated rather than ‘felt’.
Whilst it could be said that the ground floor exhibition dealt with the history of Liverpool, the exhibition on the second floor deals with the myths of the city. Fortunately they have not overdone it on the Beatles and have given space to other groups and singers from the Merseybeat era. Singers like Billy Fury, who equalled the Beatles record of 24 pop chart hits in the 1960s, were given space and I was surprised to realise just how much the city contributed to pop music. There are also exhibits on Liverpool’s other legacies, particularly in drama and poetry.
The myths, though, come from some of the large pictures and statements about Liverpool being the European New York and The People’s Republic. This is in stark contrast to the more factual ground floor exhibits which shows the wealth of the city coming from the shipping line magnates and whilst the people may have contributed towards that wealth, they did so in the same manner as people did anywhere else: through their labour.
The exhibition on the second floor is also impressive but left me wondering if there is anything more special about Liverpool than could be found in any other city such as Birmingham, Leeds or Manchester.
Well there is football; and there is space on the second floor given over to it. Liverpool does seem to go overboard on football more so than any other area of the country, and whilst this may be down to its strong history of sectarianism (equalled by Glasgow, I would think) I could find no explanation. And so, for the visitor, it is simply a given ‘fact’ that Liverpool is a footballing city.
I have to admit that I went to the Museum with some preconceptions. I have loved the design of the building but if the inside was going to be anything like the older Museum of Liverpool Life, which closed in 2006, then all that imagination and money would have been wasted. And although there are many of the exhibits, from the older museum, on show, their placement in this new building is far superior and offers much more to visitors.
The Museum of Liverpool is one of the exciting developments that is changing the face of the waterfront. I suppose there is an irony that the history of Liverpool is displayed in a building that, potentially, says much about the future of the city. Now if the developers went one step further and considered how much more attractive the waterfront would be without the Royal Liver Building, the Cunard Building and the Port of Liverpool Building, that would be a good indication that history’s home should be in museums.